学生论文
论文查询结果 |
返回搜索 |
|
论文编号: | 7599 | |
作者编号: | 2120123050 | |
上传时间: | 2015/6/16 11:44:27 | |
中文题目: | 中国乘用车燃料消耗量交易机制构建与可行性研究 | |
英文题目: | Study on the construction and feasibility of the trading mechanism of the fuel consumption of passenger car in China | |
指导老师: | 刘向东 | |
中文关键字: | 燃油经济性;交易机制;双目标管理 | |
英文关键字: | Automobile fuel economy;trading mechanism;Double target management | |
中文摘要: | 2013年中国汽车总销量突破2200万辆,连续三年年均增长率超过20%,连续五年销量世界第一。随着我国城镇化进程加速推进以及经济持续快速发展,今后较长一段时期汽车需求量仍将继续保持增长,由此带来的能源紧张和环境污染问题将更加突出。 为进一步完善我国节能管理体系,有效缓解能源和环境压力,加快汽车产业转型升级速度、提升我国汽车业的国际竞争优势。自2004年,我国先后颁布了《乘用车燃料消耗量限值》、《乘用车企业平均燃料消耗量核算办法》等多项法律法规,并在国务院《节能与新能源汽车产业发展规划》中进一步设定了我国2015年及2020年燃油经济性的目标。 然而,政策执行的硬着陆给行业与企业带来了系列影响,比如,企业社会责任压力增大、新产品准入受阻、自主产业发展遭遇管控壁垒、产品结构调整或技术升级带来成本大幅上升等。汽车节能作为一项系统工程,需要多方位、多层次、多措施的全面管理。乘用车燃料消耗量交易机制的建立,从市场调控方面对行政管控工作进行有效补充,在保证政策执行效果的同时,实现管控软着路,对我国节能管理体系的完善具有重要意义。 目前美国和欧盟等发达国家已经建立了完善的乘用车平均燃料消耗量/CO2排放管理体系,并实践中充分显示了其有效性。本文通过对比分析后认为,各国国情及油耗管理历史不同,乘用车节能管理深度与方法侧重上存在差异,对中国国情并不完全适用。本文在充分考察我国汽车行业实际国情的基础上,借鉴美国、欧盟的先进经验,创新性的构建了以实现额度获得、优质额度转结与交易为主要内容,以满足企业目标值及国家目标值为考核标准的具有中国特色的乘用车燃料消耗量交易制度,并验证了其可行性。 具有中国特色的乘用车燃料消耗量交易机制的引入,增加了汽车企业应对政策管控的灵活性,实现了社会责任与利益的最大化共赢;在保证我国燃油经济性目标实现的同时,促进了我国汽车行业技术发展和产业升级,实现了我国经济与社会的可持续发展。 | |
英文摘要: | China’s total vehicle sales has exceeded twenty-two million, and the average annual growth rate is over 20% for three years running, which makes it the world’s top seller for five consecutive years. Along with the accelerating urbanization as well as the sustainably rapid economic development, the demand of automobile in china will continue its rapid growth, resulting in serious energy shortage and environmental pollution. In order to further improving China’s energy management system, effectively alleviating the pressure on energy and the environment, accelerating the transformation of the automobile and enhancing the international competitive advantage, China has promulgated more than many relevant laws, statutes and regulations since 2004, such as Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption Limits and Corporate Passenger Vehicle Average Fuel Consumption Rate. Moreover, STATE COUNCIL of China has set the goal of automobile fuel efficiency standards in the year of 2015 and 2020 in its ‘energy - saving and new energy vehicle industry development plan’. However, a hard landing of China’s car policies have caused a series of negative influence to the industry and the corporates, such as more social responsibility pressure on car companies, new products meeting the access blockage, domestic companies facing more rigorous controls, as well as the sharp rise in the cost by technology-upgrading. Energy saving in cars is a systematic processer, it takes comprehensive and multi-level management. The establishment of passenger car fuel consumption has provided a soft landing policy, and effectively advanced administrative management, which has significant meaning in improving China’s energy management system. At present, the developed countries like Europe and America have all established the average fuel consumption of passenger cars /CO2 emissions management system, which has been proved effective. Of course it is not fully applicable for Chinese condition, however it is good for China to use their experience in the field. This paper has drew lessons from US and EU countries by applying corporate average fuel consumption (CAFC) rates for individual automobile, and integral transaction among vehicle corporations, which is considered to have higher flexibility and feasibility, and more suitable within Chinese context. To sum up, this article aims to inspire the companies to be more flexible in meeting the fuel consumption standard for passenger vehicles; promoting energy saving technology; and developing new energy automobiles in order to guarantee national energy saving target. Furthermore, based on thorough investigation of Chinese situation, this paper tries to build the Chinese passenger vehicles fuel consumption trading system, containing the attainment of corporate fuel consumption permits in the market, as well as saving and exchange of corporate own superior extras, which takes corporate targets and national standards as assessment criteria. | |
查看全文: | 预览 下载(下载需要进行登录) |