联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	6260
作者编号：	2120122676
上传时间：	2014/6/6 15:28:19
中文题目：	政府信息公开环境下档案开放制度研究
英文题目：	Research on Institution of Archives Opening in the Background of Government Information Openness
指导老师：	伍振华
中文关键字：	政府信息公开；档案开放；开放制度
英文关键字：	government information openness; archives opening; opening institution
中文摘要：	在民主化进程日益加快的大背景下，我国逐渐形成了一套以《政府信息公开条例》（以下简称《条例》）为核心的较为完备的政府信息公开制度体系，其先进的立法理念、思路和精神对我国档案开放制度具有很大的借鉴作用。 由于我国的档案开放制度的建立从上个世纪八十年代才刚刚开始，其中很多条款内容已经不适应民主化进程日益加快的当代要求，与政府信息公开制度之间也缺乏有效的衔接。因此，档案开放制度急需做出改革，否则就会阻碍我国档案工作的顺利开展，同时也会对政府信息公开的进程造成影响，而且还不利于我国民主政治的建设。 本文以政府信息公开为背景，重点分析我国档案开放制度存在的不足之处并提出相应的解决对策。文章主要有四部分构成：第一部分，研究、实践方面的综述；研究内容、方法；以及研究的难点与创新点。指出目前国内外档案学者对档案开放制度的研究现状，我国档案开放工作的实践历程以及开放率偏低、开放规模扩大、利用需求主体扩大等现实特点，从而奠定本研究的理论和实践基础。该部分还对本文的研究方法、难点及创新点进行了分析介绍。第二部分，政府信息公开、档案开放及立法技术概述。本部分对政府信息公开、档案开放的内涵及相互关系进行了深入的剖析，以期更好的理解政府信息公开及档案开放的相关制度规定。同时，本部分还论述了档案立法技术的概念、内容及存在的问题，以期从立法技术的角度对我国档案开放制度的修改完善提出一些解决对策。第三部分，探讨我国档案开放制度在政府信息公开环境下存在的不足。目前主要存在三方面的问题，一是基本内容的不足，包括立法理念的落后、开放期限设立的不合理、开放范围界定的不科学、开放鉴定程序的不规范；二是现有档案开放制度的权利空挡，包括未开放档案的申请利用权不完善、救济途径的缺乏、公布权的不合理设立；三是缺乏有效的档案开放保障机制，包括开放责任和监督主体的不明确、档案开放工作的不透明、责任追究机制的缺乏等。第四部分，针对第三部分我国档案开放制度所面临的问题，借鉴政府信息公开的相关内容以及国外先进的立法思路与实践做法，从立法设计的角度逐一提出解决之道。包括加强对公民获取档案和利用档案的权利的保护、完善档案开放制度的基本内容、构建档案开放的保障机制等。图5幅，表3个，参考文献72个。
英文摘要：	With the accelerating process of democratization, timely disclosure of government information has become a world trend. More and more countries start the freedom of government information by means of legislation. As the core of 《The Regulations of China on Freedom of information》, China has also gradually formed a set of comprehensive institutions of government information openness. Its advanced legislative concepts, ideas and spirit have great reference price to our archives opening institution . Our current institution of archives opening was formed in the eighties of the 20th century when has no information disclosure background. Its legislative concept is based on the archives work not the rights of citizens and many terms of content are not suitable for contemporary requirements. Besides, the current institution of archives opening is not well connected with government information openness institution. If the institution of archives opening can’t be reformed, it will affect the development of archives work and the process of the government information openness and the construction of democratic politics. This paper is focus on the problems of current institution of archives opening and the corresponding measures. The article has four parts: first, the study, practice review, research contents and methods, the difficulties and innovation. It also points out present research on this subject, practice course of archives opening work and its features. Second, an overview of the openness of government information, archives opening and legislation technology. Government information openness and archives opening have natural relationship, they have internal connection and unity in theory and coordinated development in practice. This part analyses the meaning of government information openness and archives opening, as well as their relationship. Meanwhile, this section also discusses the concept, content and problems of archives legislation technology, so that I can propose some countermeasures from this perspective. Third, explore the lack of institution of archives opening on the background of government information openness. There are three main problems at present: one is the lack of basic content, including outdated legislative concept, unreasonable closed period, limited opening scope and non-standard Identification procedure; another is the lack of civil rights, including the right to use the archives that are not open, the lack of relief way and unreasonable right to release; last one is the lack of effective safeguard mechanism, including undefined subject of responsibility and supervision, non-transparent work , lack of accountability mechanisms. Fourth, put forward views on issues and countermeasures faced by third by learning from the institution of government information openness and foreign advanced legislative ideas and practices, including improving the basic contents of the institution, strengthening the protection of the rights of citizens, building security mechanisms.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)