联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	5377
作者编号：	2120112513
上传时间：	2013/6/7 0:07:16
中文题目：	内隐——外显图书馆员刻板印象研究
英文题目：	Study on Implicit and Explicit Stereotype of Chinese Librarians
指导老师：	徐建华
中文关键字：	图书馆员刻板印象；内隐刻板印象；群体比较；图书馆事业边缘化
英文关键字：	Librarians’ stereotype；Implicit stereotype；Inter-group comparation；Marginalization of library industry
中文摘要：	近年来图书馆事业发展态势蓬勃，但与此同时事业边缘化的各种现象却有着愈演愈烈的态势。在这样的矛盾背景下，本研究希望借助外显、内隐刻板印象的研究路径和社会认同理论，描绘出社会（下称公众）、图书馆员和图书馆学学生（下称未来职业者）对图书馆员和图书馆职业形象的认知图景和形成原因，并据此分析出对图书馆职业边缘化等图书馆事业发展问题的启示。外显刻板印象的群体比较分析发现，图书保管员形象是图书馆员最深入人心的刻板印象，其次为信息服务者和情报专家形象，三个群体的印象差异较大；公众和未来职业者认为图书馆工作复杂舒适，但图书馆员却抱怨工作简单辛苦，社会地位不高；图书馆学专业在实践中地位尴尬；未来职业者同时表现出职业偏爱和职业焦虑的矛盾心理；图书馆员则表现出对自我高评价而对工作低评价的特点。回归分析结果显示，提升服务和改变专业话语缺失的地位是改善刻板印象的根本途径。根据内隐刻板印象的研究路径，选择单类内隐联想测验的研究范式，验证可能会收到社会赞许效应影响的职业性别刻板印象和职业内容刻板印象。分析发现，图书馆员没有显著的职业性别刻板印象，内-外群体均对图书馆员有着积极的内隐刻板印象，内-外群体对图书馆工作没有显著的刻板印象，但群体内部存在差异；未来职业者职业焦虑和职业偏爱并存的矛盾心理在内隐印象中依然明显；图书馆员的自我内隐刻板印象是积极的，与外显的矛盾心态完全不同，这意味着抱怨工作只是图书馆员为获得社会认同而采取的策略。图书馆员刻板印象的研究成果可用来解释和讨论图书馆事业发展中遇到的诸多难题：图书馆学和实践的脱节问题在于学科架构起的专业化图景与实践相距甚远，尴尬的学科专业地位是导致刻板印象相关问题的根源所在；图书馆员的自我边缘化现象实际上是图书馆员给自己贴上的附属群体标签，目的是获得群体社会认同，掩盖其在专业上的自卑；未来职业者的职业背离与图书馆学教育脱节和大学生的择业价值取向有关，建议取消本科教育，发展研究生和职业教育；图书馆事业边缘化问题的症结在于职业的专业化发展先天不足，后天又倍受冲击，因此寻求专业化发展突破是解决所有问题的关键点；图书馆事业发展与刻板印象是一种共生关系，当下的困境和刻板印象源于此前事业发展的积弊，而当下的积弊如若不妥善解决，会在未来造成更严重的事业边缘化。
英文摘要：	Although present library industry is flourishing and job attractness increases significantly, we Chinese library professionals suffer from disconfidence very much and few LIS students choose to lead their careers as a librarian. In order to understand this paradox, a possible solution is to first depict librarians’ social images/stereotypes in publics’, LIS students’ and librarians’ eyes, and discover reasons for such stereotypes and then implications for such paradox. Thus, this study was consisted of 3 minor researches: explicit stereotypes of librarians and its reasons, implicit stereotype of librarians, and implications for above embarrassing situation. By comparing explicit librarians’ stereotypes of publics, LIS students and librarians themselves in ANOVA, this study found that: “book-keeper” was the deeply ingrained stereotype of librarians in China, then was the image of “information service provider” and “information professional”; there was significant difference of the stereotype among librarians, LIS students and publics; publics and LIS students considered this work as complx and comfortable, but librarians complained about their work as inferior and laborious; professionalism of this profession hadn’t been approved by all three groups; LIS student felt significant ambivalence, they favored of this profession but felt career anxious at the same time; librarians spoke highly of themselves and at the same time, complained about their job very much. Based on MLRM (Multi Linear Regression Model) analysis, the most fundamental way to improve stereotypes was to cultivate professionalism and improve the library service satisfaction. With the Sc-IAT test, this study found that: female stereotype was not proved among three groups; both inner and outer groups regarded librarians as positive, but show no preference to library work; LIS students also showed significant ambivalence in implicit stereotypes; librarians showed self-preference both in profession and work, which indicated that complaintment about their work was just a strategy to earn social identity. Above research results have strong implications for current development problems: current LIS education and academia had significantly unrealistic expectations for practices; lack of respect for “profession-based” was the first reason for stereotype problems; Self-marginization of librarians was in fact the self-labeling as Subordinate Groups, in order to earn group social identity and conceal the group inferiority; the reason for LIS students not to lead a career as a librarian was a combination of current education problem and young adults’ career preferences, the related suggestion was to cancel undergraduate education, and develop graduate and Professional Master education; the fundamental problem of whole paradox was the lack of professionalism in library practice; there is a symbiotic relationship between librarians’ stereotypes and library development, stereotype came from previous development accomplishments or problems and would influence future library development direction.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)