×

联系我们

方式一(推荐):点击跳转至留言建议,您的留言将以短信方式发送至管理员,回复更快

方式二:发送邮件至 nktanglan@163.com

学生论文

论文查询结果

返回搜索

论文编号:2321 
作者编号:2120082112 
上传时间:2010/6/8 20:01:26 
中文题目:中国商业银行技术创新结构与财务绩效关系的实证研究  
英文题目:Technological Innovation Structure and Financial Performance: Empirical Study of Chinese Commercial Banks  
指导老师:吴晓云 
中文关键字:中国商业银行;技术创新结构;财务绩效 
英文关键字: Chinese Commercial Banks;Structure of Technological Innovation;Financial Performance 
中文摘要:近年来,经济信息化推动了中国商业银行的技术创新,使得银行产品和服务创新不断涌现,逐渐拓展了业务范围,后台处理流程和交易渠道电子化也成为中国商业银行技术创新的重要组成部分。国内外学者对于技术创新以及技术结构进行了大量研究,技术结构的不断变化以及技术创新发展,就形成了技术创新结构。国外学者对于衡量银行技术创新结构的变量进行了探索性研究,但还没有对技术创新结构的概念进行清晰的定义。目前国内学者关于银行技术创新的研究,主要局限于技术能力与创新绩效的关系方面,而对技术创新结构方面的研究较少,并基本停滞在定性分析上。 研究银行技术创新结构具有重要的理论和现实意义。经济系统的结构变化尤其是技术结构的变化是增长的必要条件,如果产生必要结构变化的能力不足,会阻碍经济的进一步增长和发展。因而在研究工作中,划分技术结构、分析技术结构的要素变化是研究创新和增长问题的一个重要方面。另外,由于时间和资源的约束性,没有哪家企业可以采取全部有利可图的技术创新行为。因此研究银行技术创新结构以及如何分配现有资源的问题显得十分必要。 本文结合银行实际,从思辨的角度分析银行技术创新结构,认为技术创新是由若干相互依存、相互作用的要素构成的系统,强调对于技术创新系统的要素之间的关系进行讨论。本文探索性的提出技术创新结构的概念,认为商业银行技术创新结构是指银行在技术创新不同类别中的构成比例、资源分配情况以及它们之间的相互联系。本文关于银行技术创新结构的研究包括不同类别中技术创新的数量及构成比例(如创新强度、首创活动)、构成要素间的关系(如创新集中度、创新连贯性与差异性)以及技术创新结构与财务绩效的关系。 本文根据战略演进的观点,认为技术创新历史决定企业的财务绩效,并采用技术创新结果度量方法。在参考先发优势、战略承诺及差异化战略等相关理论的基础上,利用数学公式定义了衡量技术创新结构的六个变量,分别为:银行创新强度、竞争对手创新强度、首创活动、创新集中度、创新连贯性和创新差异性,同时引入影响因素作为控制变量,构建出技术创新结构与财务绩效关系模型及研究假设。 在实证设计方面,本文选取了14家样本银行2002-2008年技术创新数据和财务指标作为研究对象,在数据分析的基础上对中国商业银行技术创新整体情况进行总结,同时利用SPSS13.0统计软件和回归分析、单因素方差分析、非参数检验等统计分析方法对研究假设进行验证,并得出基本结论概括如下: 经济环境、市场结构、企业规模和企业性质影响银行的技术创新绩效;国有商业银行、股份制商业银行以及城市商业银行在技术创新强度、创新集中度和首创行为方面存在显著差异,而在竞争对手创新强度和创新连贯性方面不存在显著差异;银行创新强度、首创活动数量和创新连贯性与财务绩效显著正相关;竞争对手创新强度和创新集中度与银行财务绩效负相关,但这种相关关系并不显著;银行的创新差异性与财务绩效呈现曲线相关关系,绩效随差异性水平的提高先减少再增加。 最后,本文在上述研究分析的基础上,提出对中国商业银行技术创新实践的启示,同时进一步提出本文的研究局限和未来的研究方向。  
英文摘要:In recent years, information technology has promoted technological innovation of Chinese commercial banks, which makes new products and service emerge, and also makes process and distribution innovations adopted. The research on the technological innovation of banks by Chinese scholars is mainly refer to the relationship between technology capability and innovation performance, while there is few research on the structure of technological innovation, and basically limited in the qualitative analysis. After referring to perspective on the structure of technological innovation and quantitative analysis methods by foreign scholars, this thesis studies the relationship between the structure of technological innovation and financial performance in Chinese commercial banks. Based on reviewing relevant theory and literature of technology innovation, this study states the scope of technological innovation including product and service innovation, process innovation and distribution innovation, and also defines the structure of technological innovation as the propotion of technological innovations and resource allocation in three different areas. According to the view of strategic evolution, this thesis suggests that the history of technological innovation result in the financial performance and adopts results measurement method by technological innovation. Based on the theory of first-mover advantage, strategic commitment and differentiation strategies, this study uses mathematical formula to measure six variables of the structure of technological innovation, namely: innovation intensity, competitors innovation intensity, first innovation activity, innovation focus, innovation consistency and innovative differentiation, while introduces influence factors as control variables to construct the model and research hypotheses. In the empirical design, the thesis selected the data on the technological innovations and financial indicators of 14 sample banks between 2002 and 2008. Based on the data analysis, the thesis summarizes the overall situation about technological innovation of Chinese commercial banks and tests research hypotheses to draw basic conclusions as follows: Economic environment, market structure, firm size and business nature influence technological innovation performance of the banks; The coefficients on the variables (innovation intensity, first innovation activities and innovation consistency ) are positive and significant; The coefficients on the variables(competitors innovation intensity and innovation focus) are negative but not significant; innovative differentiation makes financial performance first improves, and then worsens. Finally, according to the analysis of these studies, some advice is presented on the technological innovation of Chinese commercial banks. This study also suggests limitations and future research directions.  
查看全文:预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)