联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	2193
作者编号：	2006002
上传时间：	2010/3/25 10:48:54
中文题目：	项目评价方法论及其模型研究
英文题目：	Project evaluation
指导老师：	戚安邦
中文关键字：	项目评价，方法论，概念模型，逻辑模型
英文关键字：	Project evaluation, Methodology, Conceptual Models, Logical models
中文摘要：	在科学技术、社会生产力高度发达的现时代，项目的广泛性、多样性、复杂性越来越显著。《国际项目管理杂志》的主编罗德尼•特纳在1995年预言：“进入21世纪，基于项目的管理将会扫荡传统的职能式管理”。随着人们认识能力的提高，人们征服自然、改造自然的能力不断增强，项目的选择范围越加广泛，实践的规模越来越大，由于项目评价不当所造成的负面影响越来越严重，为此，使得项目评价研究愈加重要与必要。 项目评价方法论研究是基于项目评价问题的一般途径和方式方法的体系结构的研究。方法论作为认识世界和改造世界的方法理论，经历着向广度和深度两个方向发展延伸。一方面，方法论研究正在经历着不断分化的过程，对具体科学的方法论研究；另一方面，又在进行着综合的过程，对具体科学方法论进行概括归纳，探索研究各种具体科学方法论的共性问题。本文研究的重点是：从哲学层面上，剖析评价的哲学内涵，提炼人们对评价本质的认识；从科学层面上，分析项目的评价机理，构建项目评价系统的逻辑模型；从项目评价技术层面上，构建项目评价方法体系等。本论文主要分为以下几个部分： 1．项目评价相关理论回顾及其现存问题分析 论文的第二章对项目评价相关理论的发展进行了梳理、回顾与分析。主要包括对东西方价值思想发展的演进剖析，评价方法论的发展历程透视，以及项目评价理论的发展与实践进展进行了述评；并通过对项目相关理论回顾、梳理与反思，归纳出项目评价理论与方法的现存问题：项目评价的认识问题、项目评价方法论失范问题和项目评价的实践问题。 通过理论回顾与问题分析，领会了前人研究的思路和脉络，为项目评价方法论的深入研究提供了可借鉴的思路和创新的启迪。 2．项目评价方法论的哲学层面研究 论文的第三章，主要从价值论的角度分析了价值形成的前提条件、过程和结果，以及价值形成的过程机理，提出和构建了价值形成过程动态逻辑结构模型；从认识论的角度分析了认知、评价与决策的关系，提出和构建了认识过程动态逻辑结构模型；从评价论的角度分析了评价构成要素和评价活动过程，构建了评价活动过程动态逻辑结构模型；基于三论的关联分析，提出和构建了包括主客体及三论的评价逻辑结构模型。为项目评价方法论研究，提高和规范人们对评价的认识奠定了基础。 3．项目评价系统的构成及其模型研究 论文的第四章，首先对评价的本质内涵和基本特征进行了描述；其次，对项目评价的主客体要素和评价情势要素进行了分析；最后，提出和构建了项目评价系统的逻辑结构模型和项目评价系统评价水平层次结构模型。本章为项目评价方法论研究提供了理论基础。 4．项目评价方法论结构体系研究 论文的第五章，首先，基于对一般方法论的层次结构分析，提出和构建了项目评价方法论的层次体系结构；其次，结合项目评价方法论范式的转变研究，并借鉴霍尔三维结构的研究思想，提出和构建了项目评价方法论结构体系模型，即：依据三个基础，即哲学基础（认识论、价值论、评价论）、理论基础（系统论）、方法论基础（系统集成）；运用三个支撑（专家系统、机网系统、数据信息系统）；生成三个维度（时间、知识、逻辑）的项目评价方法论结构体系。为项目评价方法论研究提供了结构框架。 5．项目评价过程集成及其模型的研究 项目评价过程作为项目评价方法论的重要内容。论文第六章，首先基于对项目评价流程分析和项目评价程序分析，构建了项目评价过程逻辑模型，并对项目评价过程进行优化处理分析。本章为项目评价方法论的应用提供规范。 6．项目评价方法的集成研究 论文第七章，基于项目评价方法论体系研究和方法集成研究，对项目评价方法进行具体的有序安排和优化选择。主要从三个方面进行：其一，项目时间维度（立项、实施、绩效）评价方法；其二，项目内容（知识）维度，单项评价方法和综合集成评价方法；其三，物-事-人的系统评价方法；其四，提出了基于项目评价三维结构的项目评价方法总体逻辑安排及其综合集成模型。本章为项目评价方法的选择提供支撑。
英文摘要：	This dissertation is a study on methodologies of project evaluation. As the era in which we are now living becomes more and more subject to the impact of such rapidly developed technologies and productivity, it is obviously necessary that the projects we need to assess become more extensive, varied, and complicated. In 1995, Rodney Turner, editor-in-chief of Journal of International Projects Management, foresaw that “in the new 21 st century, management of projects will likely replace the traditional methods of operational management.” With the extending of project size, the negative impact caused by improper evaluation becomes more obvious in terms of sociality, environment, and humanity. In the light of this reasoning, it is thus necessary and important for both scholars and managers to pay more attention to the field of projects evaluation. Project evaluation methodology is the system of general pattern, ways and means, and orderly arrangement of method based on project assessment. As methodology is defined as the theoretical approach to understand and improve the current world, it is expanding on both horizontal and vertical aspects. On one side, methodology develops in the direction of dealing with particular subject. On the other side, it explores the principle of common issue through generalization and synthesis. Due to this, this treatise will focus on three levels to approach the subject of this study. Firstly, on the philosophical level, the intention of evaluation is analysed to increase the perception of people. Secondly, on the scientific level, the evaluation principle is refined and the logical model of project evaluation system is built up. Thirdly, on the level of technology and method, the method system of project evaluation is designated. The main parts of the dissertation are listed as following. 1. A theoretical review of project evaluation and the analysis of the current problems Chapter 2 begins with a theoretical review and an analysis of the current project evaluation theory and practice, such as, the evolution of value theory of the East and the West, the processing of evaluation methodology and practice. It summarizes the current problems of project evaluation, such as, cognitive issue of evaluation, the improper of evaluation methodology and the problem of evaluation practice. 2. The philosophical basis of the project evaluation Chapter three analyses the project evaluation based on cognisance, axiology and evaluation theory and thus puts forward their respective dynamic logical models. Based on relative analysis of cognisance, axiology and evaluation theory, the logical structure model is raised. The models and conclusion of this chapter provide the philosophical basis of human cognition on project evaluation. 3. The construction of project evaluation system Chapter 4 analyses the four following issues such as, subject, object, environment elements and the nature of the project evaluation. The logical structure model and level structure model of project evaluation are built up for the purpose of application in the theory basis of evaluation methodology. 4. The structure system of project evaluation methodology Chapter 5 puts forward the framework of level system structure for project evaluation methodology based on analysing general methodology at first. Then, the general structure of project evaluation methodology is mapped out with the aid of three dimensions structure by Hall and paradigm analysis of evaluation. The general structure of project evaluation methodology is the system that has three bases, three pillars and three dimensions. 5. The processing integration model of project evaluation Chapter 6 builds the processing logical model, which is based on workflow analysis, program analysis, and processing optimisation of project evaluation. Therefore it supplies the normal way for project evaluation practice. 6. The total integration and orderly arrangement of project methods Chapter 7 gives the orderly arrangement and selection of project methods based on three dimensions, including time dimension (formative, implement, outcome evaluation), knowledge dimension and logical dimension in order to select appropriate methods. At the same time, the synthetic integration model is put forward in order to support the practical evaluation.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)