联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	15940
作者编号：	2320233787
上传时间：	2025/12/22 9:56:39
中文题目：	T政策性银行J分行研发贷业务发展策略研究
英文题目：	Research on the Development Strategies of R&D Loan Business in J Branch of Policy Bank T
指导老师：	王曼舒
中文关键字：	农业政策性银行；研发贷；农业科技；发展策略
英文关键字：	Agricultural Policy Bank; R&D Loan; Agricultural Technology; Development Strategies
中文摘要：	在国家创新驱动发展战略与乡村振兴战略深度融合的背景下，农业科技创新成为破解“三农”发展瓶颈、保障粮食安全的核心驱动力。然而，农业科技企业研发活动具有周期长、风险高、轻资产的特性，与传统信贷依赖固定资产抵押、注重短期偿债能力的风控逻辑存在显著冲突，导致农业科技研发长期面临“融资难、融资贵”困境。在此背景下，作为唯一农业政策性银行的T银行，探索研发贷业务既是响应国家战略、履行政策性职能的必然选择，也是突破传统业务增长瓶颈，实现从传统信贷向科技金融延伸的关键路径，对完善农业科技金融支持体系具有重要实践价值。 本文以T政策性银行J分行研发贷业务为研究对象，结合《固定资产贷款管理暂行办法》等政策新规，在理论层面，梳理金融支持科技创新理论、政策性银行职能理论与无形资产质押理论，明确研发贷在农业政策性银行信贷体系中的战略定位；在实践层面，系统分析T银行研发贷业务现状，包括传统“三农”业务转型压力、现有科技型企业信贷产品局限，并以J分行审批L公司“天津市重盐碱地生态治理技术创新与实施项目”为案例，追踪从客户筛选、项目评估、审批放款到贷后管理的全流程，识别业务开展中的核心问题。 研究发现，T银行J分行研发贷业务发展存四维度制约：客群定位模糊，未明确农业科技领域边界与企业背景标准；产品设计固化，未按种业、农机等研发周期差异设定期限，利率未结合项目属性细分，还款方式难匹配研发现金流；流程无标准化指引，审批环节冗余，个案处理导致效率低；风险管控不足，农业无形资产评估差异大，研发失败率高且贷后监控滞后。据此提出策略：客群聚焦种业、生态治理等三农相关领域，优先选择国企/集团背景、有实体支撑的企业；产品设3-7年差异化期限，用分段利率与阶梯还款，叠加融智服务；流程合并准入与评估环节，建技术评估快速通道；风险上引入第三方评估与动态模型，搭组合担保体系，联动政府设风险补偿基金。研究结论可为T银行及同类机构推动研发贷规模化发展提供理论与实践参考，助力破解农业科技企业融资约束，完善农业科技金融生态。
英文摘要：	Against the backdrop of the in-depth integration of the national innovation-driven development strategy and the rural revitalization strategy, agricultural technological innovation has become the core driving force for breaking through the development bottlenecks in agriculture, rural areas, and farmers (the "Three Rural Issues") and ensuring food security. However, the R&D activities of agricultural technology enterprises are characterized by long cycles, high risks, and light assets, which are in significant conflict with the risk control logic of traditional credit—wherein fixed asset mortgages are relied upon and short-term debt-servicing capacity is emphasized. This has resulted in a long-standing dilemma of "difficulty in accessing financing and high financing costs" for agricultural technology R&D. In China, the annual growth rate of R&D funding demand of agricultural technology enterprises reaches 18%, yet the satisfaction rate of bank credit is less than 40%. Against this backdrop, for Bank T—the only agricultural policy bank—exploring the R&D loan business is not only an inevitable choice to respond to national strategies and fulfill its policy-oriented functions, but also a key path to break through the growth bottlenecks of traditional businesses and extend from traditional credit to sci-tech finance. It holds important practical value for improving the financial support system for agricultural technology. This study takes the R&D loan business of BranchJof BankT(a policy bank) as the research object, and combines new policies and regulations such as the?Interim Measures for the Administration of Fixed Asset Loans. Theoretically, it sorts out the theories of financial support for technological innovation, the functional theory of policy banks, and the theory of intangible asset pledge, so as to clarify the strategic positioning of R&D loans in the credit system of agricultural policy banks. Practically, it systematically analyzes the current situation of Bank T’s R&D loan business, including the transformation pressure of traditional "Three Rural Issues"-related businesses and the limitations of existing credit products for sci-tech enterprises. Taking the approval of the "Tianjin Heavy Saline-Alkali Land Ecological Management Technology Innovation and Implementation Project" of Company L by BranchJas a case, this study tracks the entire process from customer screening, project evaluation, approval and disbursement to post-loan management, and identifies the core problems in the business operation. The study identifies four constraints on the R&D loan business of Branch J of Bank T: vague customer positioning (no clear boundaries for agricultural technology fields or enterprise background standards); rigid product design (tenures not tailored to R&D cycles like seed/agricultural machinery, interest rates not segmented by project attributes, repayment mismatched with R&D cash flows); unstandardized processes (redundant approvals, low efficiency from case-by-case handling); and inadequate risk management (large discrepancies in agricultural intangible asset evaluation, high R&D failure rate, delayed post-loan monitoring).Corresponding strategies: focus on agriculture-related areas (seed industry, ecological governance) for customers, prioritizing state-owned enterprise/group-backed entities with physical operations; design products with 3-7 year differentiated tenures, phased interest rates, progressive repayment, plus intellectual support; streamline processes by merging access and evaluation, and set up a technical evaluation fast track; enhance risk management via third-party evaluation, dynamic models, a combined guarantee system, and government-collaborated risk compensation funds.The findings provide theoretical and practical references for Bank T and similar institutions to scale up R&D loans, helping solve financing constraints for agricultural tech enterprises and improve the agricultural sci-tech financial ecosystem.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)