联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	15913
作者编号：	2320233831
上传时间：	2025/12/12 21:28:58
中文题目：	“F+EPC”模式下Z安置房项目风险管理研究
英文题目：	Research on Risk Management of Z Resettlement Housing Project under the
指导老师：	程新生教授
中文关键字：	F+EPC；安置房；风险管理；访谈法；优化措施
英文关键字：	Resettlement Housing; Risk Management; Interview Method; Optimization Measures
中文摘要：	在国民经济平稳发展的宏观环境下，公共项目及基础设施建设项目持续推进，这直接导致建设资金的需求不断增加且结构日趋多样化与复杂化，进而迫切要求建设工程承包模式进行持续的革新与发展。 聚焦EPC模式，由于其服务对象通常涉及投资规模大、技术集成度高、施工周期长的项目，这对投资方的资金储备能力、资金调配效率以及风险管理体系的健全性和管理水平的专业性提出了严格要求。从当前地方建设的实际情况来看，一方面，基础设施建设和公共服务配套等方面的需求十分旺盛；另一方面，地方政府普遍面临着较为突出的财政赤字问题。再加上规范建设资金全过程管理的政策要求和监管环境，社会资本已成为地方建设资金的重要补充来源。社会资本在有效减轻政府资金压力、推动地方建设顺利进行的同时，也必须承担起投融资的全部环节，这也意味着将面临各种风险。 本文以安置房建设为特定研究场景，从投资者的角度出发，选取F+EPC模式下的Z安置房项目作为具体研究对象。在研究过程中，通过系统梳理政府、地方平台公司、社会资本等多方主体的基本情况和职能定位，深入分析项目投融资模式的结构设计、运行机制以及项目从规划到实施的整个流程，详细识别投资方在项目推进各个阶段可能面临的潜在风险。基于已识别的风险因素，对风险发生的概率和影响程度进行定量与定性分析。针对已识别和评估的风险，本文从多个关键维度提出了适用于F+EPC模式的切实可行的风险应对措施。 与现有研究相比，本文的创新点主要体现在两个方面：一是将理论研究与实际案例有机结合，突破了单纯理论推导的局限性，使研究结论更具实践指导意义；二是围绕F+EPC项目的实施阶段，精准关注风险的类型和程度，不再局限于宽泛的风险讨论，而是从项目重大事项和重要业务条线等方面梳理具体内容，提出针对性强、可操作性高的对策建议。希望通过这些研究成果，为投资方在F+EPC项目筛选阶段的科学决策、合作条件设定时的权责划分以及整体管理过程的优化提供切实有效的实践参考，使参与各方能够更好地实现预期目标，促进F+EPC模式在工程建设领域更加健康、有序地发展。
英文摘要：	Under the macro environment of the steady development of the national economy, public projects and infrastructure construction projects are advancing continuously. This directly leads to a constant increase in the demand for construction funds, with the structure becoming increasingly diversified and complex, which in turn urgently requires continuous innovation and development of construction project contracting models. Focusing on the EPC model, since its service targets usually involve projects with large investment scales, high technical integration, and long construction cycles, it imposes strict requirements on the investor's capital reserve capacity, capital allocation efficiency, the soundness of the risk management system, and the professionalism of management capabilities. From the current actual situation of local construction, on one hand, the demand for infrastructure construction and public service supporting facilities is extremely strong; on the other hand, local governments generally face prominent fiscal deficit issues. Coupled with policy requirements and regulatory environments such as preventing the emergence of implicit debts and standardizing the whole-process management of construction funds, social capital has become an important supplementary source of local construction funds. While social capital effectively alleviates the government's capital pressure and promotes the smooth progress of local construction, it also has to take on all links of investment and financing, which means it will face various risks. Taking the construction of resettlement housing as a specific research scenario, this paper selects the Z Resettlement Housing Project under the F+EPC model as the specific research object from the perspective of investors. During the research process, by systematically sorting out the basic information and functional positioning of multiple subjects including the government, local platform companies, and social capital, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the structural design and operation mechanism of the project's investment and financing model, as well as the entire process of the project from planning to implementation, and identifies in detail the potential risks that investors may face at various stages of the project advancement. Based on the identified risk factors, a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the probability of risk occurrence and the degree of impact is carried out. In response to the identified and assessed risks, this paper proposes practical and feasible risk response measures applicable to the F+EPC model from multiple key dimensions. Compared with existing studies, the innovations of this paper are mainly reflected in two aspects: first, it organically combines theoretical research with practical cases, breaking through the limitations of pure theoretical deduction and making the research conclusions more practically guiding; second, it focuses on the types and degrees of risks precisely around the implementation stage of F+EPC projects. Instead of being limited to broad risk discussions, it sorts out specific contents from aspects such as major project matters and important business lines, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions with strong pertinence and high operability. It is hoped that through these research results, practical and effective references can be provided for investors to make scientific decisions in the F+EPC project screening stage, define rights and responsibilities when setting cooperation conditions, and optimize the overall management process, enabling all participating parties to better achieve their expected goals and promoting the healthier and more orderly development of the F+EPC model in the field of engineering construction.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)