联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	15635
作者编号：	2320233839
上传时间：	2025/12/8 17:06:08
中文题目：	K企业集团治理机制优化研究
英文题目：	Study on the Optimization of Group Governance Mechanism of K Enterprise
指导老师：	马连福
中文关键字：	集团治理；差异化管控；治理机制；治理优化
英文关键字：	Group Governance; Differentiated Management and Control; Governance Mechanism; Governance Optimization
中文摘要：	国有企业作为我国国民经济核心支柱，在深化改革与市场化转型中，有一部分通过股权投资、并购重组形成了多层级集团化股权架构。这种模式虽然助力企业实现产业链整合和新兴业务的孵化，但股权层级与子公司数量的增加容易引发集团治理难题，成为制约国有集团企业高质量发展的关键瓶颈。 政策层面，《国有企业改革深化提升行动方案（2023-2025年）》文件精神指导国有企业从“规模扩张”转向“内部治理质量提升”，集团治理效能将影响改革成效；混合所有制改革深化使国有集团企业股权结构更复杂，集团治理难度进一步上升。市场层面，经济下行周期与高质量发展要求叠加，国有集团企业需要优化内部治理以实现提质增效的目标。 本文研究的对象K企业，是某市国有控股集团企业，下辖20家子公司，其子公司多元、股权结构复杂的集团治理场景，具有一定典型性。K企业虽已形成以“全资/非全资”划分，覆盖职责划分、决策、监督和激励四个维度的集团治理机制，但受子公司类型多元、经营情况各异、股权结构复杂的影响，现有的集团治理机制仍不能很好地解决治理过程中遇到的问题。 经诊断，K企业集团治理机制存在以下问题：一是治理职责与需求错位，管理资源分配不合理、缺技术研发治理职责、母公司部门权责不对等；二是决策机制低效且权责错配，增加集团负担与风险，董监事履职能力弱、意愿低；三是监督机制不健全，无差异化监督，未覆盖招标采购等领域，监事会失效；四是子公司激励机制单一，考核重利润、轻合规，激励覆盖窄、工具少。 本文基于集团治理与差异化管控理念，聚焦K企业集团治理机制优化研究，首先按股权比例、利润规模、合规水平将子公司进行细分，为差异化治理打下基础，随后提出：建直管与提级治理机制、优化架构；划分“放权/集权类”子公司，制订权限清单，建立董事个人表决机制；应用差异化监督周期与方式，填补监督领域空白，以审计委员会替代监事会；设定差异化的考核维度，扩大激励范围，丰富激励工具。本文试图在实践上帮助K企业解决集团治理机制存在的问题，并为面临类似问题的集团企业提供参考。
英文摘要：	As the core pillar of China's national economy, some state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have formed multi-level grouped equity structures through equity investment, mergers and acquisitions during the deepening of reforms and market-oriented transformation. While this model helps enterprises achieve industrial chain integration and incubation of emerging businesses, the increase in equity levels and the number of subsidiaries is prone to triggering group governance challenges, becoming a key bottleneck restricting the high-quality development of state-owned group enterprises. At the policy level, the spirit of the "Action Plan for Deepening and Upgrading the Reform of State-Owned Enterprises (2023-2025)" guides SOEs to shift from "scale expansion" to "internal governance quality improvement", and the effectiveness of group governance will affect the reform results. The deepening of mixed-ownership reform has made the equity structure of state-owned group enterprises more complex, further increasing the difficulty of group governance. At the market level, the overlap of economic downturn cycles and the requirements for high-quality development has made it necessary for state-owned group enterprises to optimize internal governance to achieve the goal of improving quality and efficiency. The research object of this paper, Enterprise K, is a state-controlled group enterprise in a certain city, with 20 affiliated subsidiaries. Its group governance scenario featuring diversified subsidiaries and complex equity structure has certain typicality. Although Enterprise K has established a group governance mechanism divided by "wholly-owned/non-wholly-owned" and covering four dimensions: responsibility division, decision-making, supervision and incentive, affected by the diversified types of subsidiaries, different operating conditions and complex equity structure, the existing group governance mechanism still cannot well solve the problems encountered in the governance process. Through analysis and diagnosis, the group governance mechanism of Enterprise K has the following problems: first, the mismatch between governance responsibilities and needs, unreasonable allocation of management resources, lack of responsibilities for technological R&D governance, and unequal powers and responsibilities among parent company departments; second, inefficient decision-making mechanism and mismatched powers and responsibilities, which increase the burden and risks of the group, and the directors and supervisors have weak performance capabilities and low willingness; third, incomplete supervision mechanism, lack of differentiated supervision, failure to cover areas such as bidding and procurement, and ineffective board of supervisors; fourth, single incentive mechanism for subsidiaries, emphasizing profit over compliance in assessment, narrow incentive coverage and few incentive tools. Based on the concepts of group governance and differentiated management and control, this paper focuses on the research on optimizing the group governance mechanism of Enterprise K. First, it subdivides subsidiaries according to equity ratio, profit scale and compliance level to lay the foundation for differentiated governance. Then it proposes: establishing direct management and upgraded governance mechanisms and optimizing the structure; dividing subsidiaries into "decentralized/centralized types", formulating authority lists, and establishing an individual voting mechanism for directors; applying differentiated supervision cycles and methods to fill gaps in supervision areas and replacing the board of supervisors with an audit committee; setting differentiated assessment dimensions, expanding incentive scope and enriching incentive tools. This paper attempts to help Enterprise K solve the problems existing in its group governance mechanism in practice and provide reference for group enterprises facing similar problems.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)