×

联系我们

方式一(推荐):点击跳转至留言建议,您的留言将以短信方式发送至管理员,回复更快

方式二:发送邮件至 nktanglan@163.com

学生论文

论文查询结果

返回搜索

论文编号:14606 
作者编号:2320213929 
上传时间:2024/6/4 15:37:49 
中文题目:G小型新能源公司项目投资后评价体系构建研究 
英文题目:Research on the Construction of Post-investment Evaluation System for Small New Energy Company G 
指导老师:刘志远 
中文关键字:新能源投资;项目投资后评价;小型企业 
英文关键字:New energy investment;Post-investment evaluation research;Small enterprise 
中文摘要:随着我国到2050年实现“碳达峰”“碳中和”的能源发展战略的确立、电力市场化改革的大力推进,以及新能源产业的不断优化升级,我国的新能源行业呈现高速发展的态势。由于近年来新能源补贴取消、电力供给侧改革、分布式能源的普及等政策和行业因素的叠加,新能源行业的投资环境也在快速地发生变化。对新能源投资企业而言,能够有效地抓住投资机遇、降低投资风险、及时反馈并处理投资环节出现的问题,是企业在行业中立足的重要支持。因此,建立符合新能源投资特点的后评价体系具有积极意义。 本文选取了新能源投资行业的小型企业——G公司作为分析案例,通过对G公司基本情况、财务数据、投资项目的运行数据以及投资评价现状进行分析,发现了G公司在项目投资后评价环节中存在一定的缺陷,并导致了一系列的管理问题。本文在项目投资后评价研究、新能源电站投资研究基础上,采用文献调查法,并结合G公司实际情况对企业项目投资后评价体系的要求进行分解细化,通过对公司管理层、员工和行业专家的访谈、问卷调查相结合的形式筛选出28个底层评价指标,运用层次分析法构建形成适用于G公司的评价指标体系,继而运用模糊综合评价法输出评价结果。 通过收集G公司管理层、核心员工和行业专家对G公司后评价指标的逐项评价结果,发现G公司在投资决策流程和外部风险管理层面表现较好,在现金流健康程度、资金管理和评价制度建设方面存在一定的改进空间。该评价结果与分析G公司投资评价现状得到的结果基本符合,这也说明了构建的G公司项目投资后评价体系及模型切实有效。 最后根据G公司项目投资后评价发现的问题,总结提炼了相应的改进建议,以期提升G公司的投资管理水平,并对于G公司实施项目投资后评价体系后可以取得的改进予以说明。 
英文摘要:With the establishment of China's energy development strategy of "carbon peak" and "carbon neutrality" by 2050, the vigorous promotion of electricity market reform, and the continuous optimization and upgrading of the new energy industry, China's new energy industry has shown a rapid development trend. Due to the superposition of policy and industry factors such as the cancellation of new energy subsidies, power supply side reform, and the popularity of distributed energy in recent years, the investment environment of the new energy industry is also changing rapidly. For new energy investment enterprises, being able to effectively seize investment opportunities, reduce investment risks, timely feedback and deal with problems in the investment process is an important support for enterprises to gain a foothold in the industry. Therefore, it is of positive significance to establish a post-evaluation system that conforms to the characteristics of new energy investment. This paper selects Company G, a small enterprise in the new energy investment industry, as an analysis case. By analyzing the basic situation, financial data, operation data of the investment project and the status quo of investment evaluation of Company G, it finds a series of problems in the post-investment evaluation of Company G. Based on the research on project post-investment evaluation and new energy power plant investment, this paper adopts the literature survey method and combines the actual situation of G Company to analyze and refine the requirements of the enterprise project post-investment evaluation system, and selects 28 low-level evaluation indicators through interviews and questionnaires with the company's management, employees and industry experts. The evaluation index system suitable for G company is constructed by AHP, and then the evaluation results are output by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. By collecting the evaluation results of G company's management, core employees and industry experts on the post-evaluation indicators of G Company, it is found that G company performs well in the investment decision-making process and external risk management, and has certain room for improvement in cash flow health, capital management and evaluation system construction. The evaluation results are basically consistent with the results obtained from the analysis of the current situation of G Company's investment evaluation, which also shows that the constructed post-investment evaluation system and model of G Company's project are effective. Finally, according to the problems found in the project post-investment evaluation of G Company, the corresponding improvement suggestions are summarized to improve the investment management level of G Company, and the improvement that can be achieved after the implementation of the project post-investment evaluation system of G company is explained. 
查看全文:预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)