学生论文
|
论文查询结果 |
返回搜索 |
|
|
|
| 论文编号: | 13858 | |
| 作者编号: | 2120202979 | |
| 上传时间: | 2023/6/1 17:14:31 | |
| 中文题目: | 中国农村居民数字素养评价指标体系研究 | |
| 英文题目: | Research on the evaluation index system of digital literacy for rural residents in China | |
| 指导老师: | 柯平 | |
| 中文关键字: | 数字素养;信息素养;农村居民;评价指标体系 | |
| 英文关键字: | Digital literacy; Information literacy; Rural residents; Evaluation Indicator System | |
| 中文摘要: | 随着数字技术的快速发展和数字乡村建设的不断推进,数字技术已经渗透到农村居民生活生产等各个领域,数字素养不仅成为大家的必备素养,也成为了推动数字乡村内生发展的关键动力。因此,研究农村居民数字素养评价体系,加大农村居民数字素养培育力度势在必行。 然而目前国内关于数字素养评价指标体系的研究主要聚焦于教师和学生等特定人群,缺乏针对农村居民开展的系统研究。针对这一研究现状,本文提出针对农村居民建立一个具有中国本土特色的数字素养指标体系,为全面准确地了解中国农村居民数字素养整体水平提供工具,为农村居民数字素养的提升提供方向和引导,培养合格的农村数字公民。 本研究在对国内外主要数字素养框架进行对比分析的基础上,根据我国当前的政治文化经济环境和农村居民在数字社会中的实际需求,构建了适用于农村地区的数字素养指标体系,随后采用德尔菲法,经过两轮专家咨询对指标进行完善。并借助Yaahp软件确定农村居民数字素养各评价指标权重,最后形成了一个赋权的数字素养指标体系。该体系有数字意识、数字技能、数字应用、数字安全4个一级指标,以及18个二级指标。其中数字技能是权重最高的一级指标。 此后,以构建的指标体系为基础设计问卷,对河南地区农村居民展开了数字素养问卷调查,评估农村居民数字素养现状,验证所构建指标体系的可靠性与科学性。结果显示农村居民数字素养水平不高,在数字创作等技能维度和数字生产、数字经营、数字治理等应用维度仍有较大的提升空间。 最后,本研究根据调查过程中遇到的问题对农村居民数字素养评价流程提出了优化建议。一要优化评价开展过程,建立自上而下的评价组织体系,根据评估目的和需求灵活选择评价方式。二要优化评价标准,做到评价体系标准化,评价语言简单化,评价内容全面详实。 | |
| 英文摘要: | With the rapid development of digital technology and the continuous promotion of the construction of digital villages, digital technology has penetrated into all areas of rural residents' life and production, and digital literacy has not only become a necessary literacy for everyone, but also a key driving force for the endogenous development of digital villages. Therefore, it is imperative to study the evaluation system of digital literacy of rural residents and increase the efforts to cultivate digital literacy of rural residents. However, the current research on digital literacy evaluation index systems in China mainly focuses on specific groups of people, such as teachers and students, and there is a lack of systematic research for rural residents. However, the current research on digital literacy evaluation index systems in China mainly focuses on specific groups of people such as teachers and students, and there is a lack of systematic research on rural residents. To address this research situation, this paper proposes to establish a digital literacy index system with Chinese local characteristics for rural residents, in order to provide tools for a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the overall level of digital literacy of rural residents in China, provide direction and guidance for the improvement of digital literacy of rural residents, and cultivate qualified rural digital citizens. Based on a comparative analysis of major digital literacy frameworks at home and abroad, this study constructs a digital literacy indicator system applicable to rural areas based on China's current political, cultural and economic environment and the actual needs of rural residents in a digital society, followed by a Delphi method and two rounds of expert consultation to refine the indicators. And with the help of Yaahp software to determine the weights of each evaluation indicator of digital literacy of rural residents, a weighted digital literacy indicator system was finally formed. The system has four primary indicators: digital awareness, digital skills, digital applications and digital security, as well as 18 secondary indicators. Among them, digital skills is the highest weighted level one indicator. Afterwards, a questionnaire was designed based on the constructed index system, and a questionnaire survey on digital literacy was conducted among 187 rural residents in Henan Province to assess the current situation of digital literacy among rural residents and to verify the reliability and scientificity of the constructed index system. The results show that the digital literacy level of rural residents is not high, and there is still much room for improvement in skills such as digital creation and application dimensions such as digital production, digital management and digital governance. Finally, this study makes suggestions for optimising the process of evaluating digital literacy among rural residents based on the problems encountered in the survey process. Firstly, the evaluation process should be optimised, a top-down evaluation organisation system should be established, and evaluation methods should be chosen flexibly according to the purpose and needs of the evaluation. Secondly, the evaluation criteria should be optimised, so that the evaluation system is standardised, the evaluation language is simple and the evaluation content is comprehensive and detailed. | |
| 查看全文: | 预览 下载(下载需要进行登录) |