学生论文
|
论文查询结果 |
返回搜索 |
|
|
|
| 论文编号: | 11723 | |
| 作者编号: | 2120183017 | |
| 上传时间: | 2020/6/20 2:16:16 | |
| 中文题目: | 包容型领导对员工越轨创新影响的实证研究——心理授权的中介及创新奖赏的调节 | |
| 英文题目: | The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Creative Deviance—— Mediation Effect of Psychological Empowerment and Moderation Effect of Perceivd Reward for Creativity | |
| 指导老师: | 刘俊振 | |
| 中文关键字: | 越轨创新;包容型领导;心理授权;创新奖赏 | |
| 英文关键字: | Creative Deviance; Inclusive Leadership; Psychological Empowerment ; Perceivd Reward for Creativity | |
| 中文摘要: | 当下,持久的创新能力和活力已然成为企业的核心竞争优势,而这需要最大化调动员工的主动性和创新意识。由于领导认知资源有限,难免出现认知缺陷,拒绝员工提出的有助于提升工作效率、改进产品和服务乃至是颠覆商业模式的新想法。在这种情境下,有的员工选择继续深耕被拒绝的想法,而员工的这种被拒绝之后的坚持行为,学术界将其称为“越轨创新”。当下崛起的新生代员工创新意识更强,在工作中也更追求自我,越轨创新行为在工作场所中并不少见。因此了解这种行为模式的产生机制具有重要意义,有助于企业更好地管理员工、激发员工创造力。 众所周知,中国是一个人情社会,面子顾虑是员工行为选择的重要影响因素,为什么员工决定冒着风险坚持已经被拒绝的想法呢?毫无疑问,个人特质如冒险性具有重要作用,但员工动机状态以及自己的未来预设或许更能驱动主动性的潜在风险行为。在此,本研究立足于服务管理实践,从组织和领导两方面着手,探求影响员工动机状态和未来期望,以及影响越轨创新的因素。在文献分析基础上,本研究基于主动动机模型和社会信息加工理论,认为越轨创新作为一种和领导相关的行为选择,包容型领导风格将是重要的影响因素,而这种领导风格的认知会激发员工内在强大力量即心理授权,由此驱动越轨创新行为。同时,本研究认为组织的创新奖赏具有重要的调节作用。 本文在文献梳理的基础上,首先明晰了学术界所争议的越轨创新的含义,在此基础上,进一步总结出该行为具有冒险性和收益性(组织和个人双赢)并举的特质。紧接着,本研究通过问卷调查法,共收集316份有效问卷,并通过层级回归分析验证了本文的三个假设:第一,包容型领导正向预测员工越轨创新行为;第二,心理授权在包容型领导风格与员工越轨创新行为间起部分中介作用;第三,员工的创新奖赏感知正向调节心理授权与越轨创新的关系。 | |
| 英文摘要: | At present, lasting innovation ability and vitality have become the core competitive advantage of enterprises, which needs to maximize the mobilization of employees' initiative and innovation consciousness. Because of the limited cognitive resources , it is inevitable that the leaders have cognitive defects, and reject the new ideas that employees put forward to help improve work efficiency, improve products and services, and even subvert business models. In this situation, some employees choose to continue to improve the rejected ideas, and the employee's persistent behavior after the rejection, which the academic circles call " Creative Deviance ". The rising new generation of employees have a stronger sense of innovation and pursue themselves in their work, and creative deviance behavior is not uncommon in the workplace. Therefore, it is of great significance to understand the mechanism of this behavior pattern, which is helpful for enterprises to better manage their employees and stimulate their creativity. As we all know, China is a human relationship society, face concern is an important factor in the choice of employee behavior, why do employees decide to take the risk to insist on the idea that has been rejected? There is no doubt that personal traits such as risk-taking play an important role, but employee motivational states and their own future presuppositions may be more likely to drive proactive potential risk behaviors. Here, this study is based on the practice of service management, starting from the two aspects of organization and leadership, to explore the factors that affect employee motivation state and future expectations, as well as the factors that affect deviant innovation. It is believed that creative deviance is a kind of behavior choice related to leadership and inclusive leadership style will be an important influencing factor. The cognition of such leadership style will stimulate employees' inner powerful force-psychological empowerment, then it will drive creative deviance behavior. At the same time, this study believes that perceivd reward for creativity has an important regulatory role. On the basis of literature combing, this paper first clarifies the meaning of creative deviance, and on this basis, further summarizes that the behavior has the characteristics of both risk-taking and profitability (both organizational and individual win-win). Then ,316 valid questionnaires were collected through questionnaire survey, and three hypotheses were verified by hierarchical regression analysis: firstly, inclusive leadership positively predicted employee creative deviance behavior; secondly, psychological empowerment played a part intermediary role in the relationship between inclusive leadership and creative deviance; thirdly, perceivd reward for creativity positively regulated the relationship between psychological empowerment and creative deviance. | |
| 查看全文: | 预览 下载(下载需要进行登录) |