联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	10202
作者编号：	2120162784
上传时间：	2018/6/11 16:55:55
中文题目：	公共图书馆社会合作研究
英文题目：	Research on Social Cooperation of Public Libraries
指导老师：	徐建华
中文关键字：	社会合作;公共图书馆;案例分析;实践经验
英文关键字：	social cooperation;public libraries;case study;practical experience
中文摘要：	近年来社会合作是图书馆发展的趋势，图书馆需要通过社会合作不断完善服务，实现共赢。本研究希望通过对五个公共图书馆开展社会合作的案例进行分析，从中得出一些实践经验，并据此得出公共图书馆如何开展社会合作等图书馆事业发展问题的启示。 本研究实地调研了杭州、苏州、上海、宁波、合肥、沧州、温州等地多家公共图书馆，对多个图书馆员与图书馆管理者进行了访谈，最终选择了五家公共图书馆社会合作的案例作为研究的对象去探究当前国内公共图书馆是如何看待与社会力量合作，社会合作的对象都有哪些,以及如何开展社会合作. 本研究包括对图书馆社会合作的已有研究回顾、对社会合作相关概念的研究回顾，包括利益相关者、社会力量参与图书馆建设、业务外包、政府购买图书馆服务等，并讨论了公共图书馆社会合作与外包以及政府购买之间的区别。 本研究选取了五个公共图书馆作为研究对象，分别是杭州市图书馆、苏州独墅湖园区图书馆、沧州市图书馆、温州市图书馆、合肥市图书馆。其中杭州市图书馆的案例是对运动分馆社会化办馆、科技分馆成立民间阅读组织联盟、杭州市图书馆开展芝麻信用借书进行分析；苏州独墅湖园区图书馆的案例是对其建立阅读联盟与志愿者队伍进行分析；沧州市图书馆案例是对其运营城市书吧的分析，如千合耳语城市书吧、7+城市书吧、浮阳城市书吧等；温州市图书馆案例是对其“三城一网”的社会化办馆进行分析；合肥市图书馆案例是对其与独立书店合作开办分馆、开放悦书房、开通信用借阅服务等进行分析。 我们对以上五个公共图书馆在社会合作中的积累的经验进行了分析与总结，得出以下六条经验，即：一是公共图书馆应主动寻求社会合作；二是公共图书馆在选择社会合作对象时应注意多样化；三是为了更好的保障社会合作，各个公共图书馆应建立起适合本馆的社会合作的评估标准，完善激励与淘汰机制；四是公共图书馆应与社会合作对象成立互惠联盟，更好地管理合作；五是为了进一步吸引社会力量的加入，公共图书馆应建立志愿者队伍；六是公共图书馆开展社会合作需要法律法规的保障。 社会合作是一种平等的、互利共赢的方式，公共图书馆可以给社会组织带来人气，提供场地，同时可以带来品牌效应。对于公共图书馆社会合作的深入研究，有助于帮助社会力量了解社会合作，推动社会力量积极参与图书馆的建设。 图6个，表15个，参考文献75篇。
英文摘要：	In recent years, the social cooperation of the library is the trend of library development. Public libraries need to improve the service through social cooperation to achieve a win-win situation. Social cooperation is an equal and mutually beneficial way. Public libraries can not only provide with the space but also bring fame and brand effect to social organizations. The in-depth study of social cooperation in public libraries will help social forces understand social cooperation and promote the active participation of social forces in the construction of libraries. The aim of this study is to carry out the social cooperation case analysis based on five public libraries and conclude some practical experience. On the basis of analyzing，we can help public understand the importance of social cooperation for public libraries and how to carry out social cooperation for the further development. In this study, field surveys were used to investigate public libraries in Hangzhou, Suzhou, Shanghai, Ningbo, Hefei, Cangzhou, Wenzhou, etc. We interviewed several librarians and library managers. Finally, we selected social cooperation of five public libraries as research objects. The study explore how the domestic public libraries views social cooperation currently, the variety of the collaborator, and how to develop social cooperation. This study includes a review of existing research on library social cooperation and a review of relevant concepts of social cooperation, including stakeholders, social forces involved in library construction, business outsourcing, and government procurement of library services. This study selected five public libraries as the research objects, namely, Hangzhou Public Library, Suzhou Dushu Lake Library, Cangzhou Library, Wenzhou Library, and Hefei Library. The case of Hangzhou Library is the analysis of the socialization of sports branch libraries, the establishment of a reading organization alliance by science and technology branch library, and Zhima credit book borrowing; the case of the Suzhou Dushu Lake Library is establishing reading alliance and volunteer team; the case of Cangzhou Library is about operating city book bar, such as Qianhe Whisper City Book Bar, 7+ City Book Bar, Fuyang City Book Bar, etc; the case of Wenzhou Library is the analysis of the socialization of the “three cities and one network”; the case of Hefei Library is to analyze the cooperation with an independent bookstore as a branch library, the opening of Yue Study room, and Zhima credit book borrowing service. We have analyzed and summarized the empirical experience of five public libraries in social including: First, public libraries should initiatively seek social cooperation; second, public libraries should select a great diversity of cooperation partners. Third, in order to better ensure social cooperation, public libraries should establish assessment criteria for social cooperation and improve the incentive and elimination mechanism. Fourth, public libraries should establish cooperation alliance with cooperation partners to better manage cooperation; Fifth, in order to further attract the participation of social forces, public libraries should establish volunteer teams; and sixth, public libraries need the protection of laws and regulations for social cooperation. Based on the results of the case analysis, the study discussed the differences between social cooperation and outsourcing of public libraries ,between social cooperation and government purchases. This paper includes 6 graphs ,15 tables and 75 references.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)