联系我们

论文查询结果	返回搜索

论文编号：	10175
作者编号：	1120150851
上传时间：	2018/6/11 11:02:55
中文题目：	贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制研究
英文题目：	Research on the Standardization Mechanism of Basic Public Cultural Services in Poverty-stricken Areas
指导老师：	柯平
中文关键字：	基本公共文化服务；标准化；机制；贫困地区；特色文化资源
英文关键字：	basic public cultural services; standardization; operating mechanism; poverty-stricken areas ; featured cultural resources
中文摘要：	近年来，随着党中央、国务院加大对公共文化服务体系建设的重视力度，我国的公共文化服务体系，特别是基本公共文化服务体系日臻完善，各级各类图书馆迎来了前所未有的发展机遇，图书馆实践界、学界积极响应国家号召，为建设“覆盖全社会的公共文化服务体系”和促进“社会主义文化大发展大繁荣”而努力奋斗，积极投入到公共文化服务的相关研究和公共图书馆服务体系建设中，发挥着公共文化服务的主力军和主心骨的作用。党的十八届三中全会提出，要“促进基本公共文化服务标准化、均等化”。在对此重大命题的研究中，经历了从“公共文化服务”到“基本公共文化服务”概念的变化以及对“标准化、均等化”的探索，都具有里程碑的意义。现有研究中，对公共文化服务均等化、基本公共文化服务均等化的研究成果较多，而对公共文化服务标准化，特别是基本公共文化服务标准化的相关研究较少，且对基本公共文化服务标准化的研究，多处于对概念的界定、讨论以及对标准化制度、措施的调研和客观描述，对于深入基本公共文化服务的标准化机制研究，比较匮乏。基本公共文化服务的标准化机制，是与公共文化服务相关的学界、实践界以及公共部门开展相关研究、提升服务效能以及进行科学决策的重要基础。 特别是对我国公共文化服务的短板——广大贫困地区来说，对这种兜底线、保民生的基本公共文化服务更为迫切。可以说，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的建设，直接关系到党中央、国务院提出的关于我国公共文化服务体系建设重大决策的成败。本研究从贫困地区的现实背景进行阐述和分析，在此基础上开展实地调研，研究者参与到实际情境中，运用扎根理论研究法的思想，通过规范的案例研究方法进行探索，构建理论模型。最后，通过问卷调查、深度访谈、实际观察等方式，结合构建的模型，构建了贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化机制及标准体系，并指出机制中的关键问题，提出相关实现策略。 本研究的主要结论为: 第一，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制，以当地特色文化资源为核心工具，以提升贫困地区的经济收益为贯穿基本公共文化服务标准化的主轴，以国家法律法规保障体系、党政机构的脱贫攻坚任务、民众自身的文化刚需为直接驱动力，激发当地党政机构、文化管理和服务机构以及民众自身的内生造血动能，以阶梯式提升的态势，不断推进贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化的发展，谋求当地基本公共文化服务的经济与社会效益的平衡点，并以东部发达地区为标杆，不断提升当地基本公共文化服务的水平，达到保障贫困地区民众基本文化权利、提升贫困地区民众文化素养的最终目的。 第二，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制的本质，是在驱动力驱动下，标准自适应并达到平衡预期的过程，在达到新的平衡预期之前，发展势差是新驱动力的激发要素。贫困地区的基本公共文化服务标准化机制的本质是驱动力驱动下的国家标准自适应当地并达到相对平衡预期的过程，在达到新的平衡预期之前，发展势差是新驱动力的激发要素。 第三，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制的过程，是经济与社会效益阶呈梯式提升的过程。贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化过程，是从“驱动力驱动，到实施服务，再到标准的自适应，达到相对平衡预期，出现发展势差后再激发驱动”的过程。在这个过程中，贯穿着当地特色文化资源的经济价值和社会价值，这种价值的直观体现是贫困地区的人民群众通过参与到基本公共文化服务之后，其经济与社会效益的阶梯式提升，这种提升是针对整个地区所有公民的。 第四，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制的目的，是通过经济效益提升民众的文化参与积极性。贫困地区的特色文化资源是当地的无形资产，将非遗文化融入基本公共文化服务中，使普通民众既有参与的兴趣，又从中得到实惠，既保护和传承了当地文化，又对外进行了宣传。 第五，贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制的核心纽带，是当地特色文化资源的经济价值。文化与经济从来都不是互相对立的，更多时候是相互补充的，是统一的。贫困地区的基本公共文化服务的标准化机制，不论是在驱动力中，还是在实施、标准自适应以及达到平衡预期的过程中，都暗含着当地特色文化资源的经济价值这一核心纽带，甚至是达到一定程度的平衡预期后，再次产生发展势差的过程，还是离不开当地特色文化资源的经济价值这一核心要素。 本研究的创新点主要有: 第一，本研究填补了关于贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化机制研究的空缺点，探明贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化的本质属性及核心纽带，丰富了关于基本公共文化服务标准化领域的研究，为后续研究者展开关于基本公共文化服务标准化的研究提供了理论基础。 第二，进一步明晰贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制，深化了基本公共文化服务标准化领域的研究，为突破贫困地区基本公共文化服务水平与社会经济发展水平之间的模糊关系，尤其对打破经济落后地区基本公共文化服务发展态势不明这一常规固化印象提供了有意义的洞见。 第三，提出贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化的驱动力由党政（政府）、法律与民众（市场）三方构成，与近年来国家治理体系的发展相呼应，丰富和发展了国家基本公共文化治理相关理论，为现有国家治理理论提供了一个全新的视角。 本研究对实践工作的贡献主要在于： 第一，打开贫困地区基本公共文化服务的标准化机制“黑箱”，通过提出的模型和标准体系，为政府和公共文化机构提供了从表面现象到机制的深度视角，并揭示了贫困地区基本公共文化服务标准化的全过程，为政府和公共文化机构提供了标准化机制不同阶段的剖析，从而科学地为决策提供有力参考。 第二，探讨了如何实现贫困地区基本公共文化服务与经济社会效益统一协调发展的具体措施和实施路径，对我国广大贫困地区的公共文化服务工作有一定的实践操作参考价值。图7幅，表42个，参考文献199篇。
英文摘要：	In recent years, as more emphasis is put by the Party Central Committee and the State Council on the building of public cultural service system, China’s public cultural service system, especially basic public cultural service system, is increasingly improving, which has brought unprecedented development opportunities for libraries at various levels. As a response to the nation’s call, library practice circles and academia have acted as the main force and backbone of public cultural services by striving to construct “a public cultural service system covering the whole society ” and promote “socialist cultural development and prosperity”, and actively engaging in related researches on public cultural services and the construction of public library service system. The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed to “boost the standardization and equalization of basic public cultural services.” In the study of this major proposition, the concept change from “public cultural services” to “basic public cultural services” and the exploration of “standardization and equalization” have all demonstrated milestone significance. Among existing researches, there are much more achievements on the equalization of public cultural services and basic public cultural services than that on the standardization of public cultural services, especially basic public cultural services. Furthermore, researches on the standardization of basic public cultural services focus more on concept definition and discussion, and investigation and objective description of standardized systems and measures, while less on standardization. The standardization of the of basic public cultural services is an important foundation for academia, practice circles, and public sectors related to public cultural services to conduct related researches, improve service effectiveness, and make scientific decisions. This kind of basic public cultural services featuring “holding the bottom line and ensuring people’s livelihood” is even more needed by the vulnerable part of China’s public cultural services-the vast poverty-stricken areas. The construction of basic public cultural service system in poverty-stricken areas, so to speak, is directly related to the success or failure of major decisions made by the Party Central Committee and the State Council on the construction of China’s public cultural service system. Based on the elaboration and analysis on the practical background of poverty-stricken areas, this research conducted on-the-spot investigations, participated in actual situations, applied the idea of grounded theory research method, and made explorations through standard case study methods to establish a theoretical model. And finally, by means of questionnaires, in-depth interviews and actual observations, and with the help of the established model, the standardization mechanism and standard system of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas were constructed, in which key issues were pointed out, and relevant implementation strategies were put forward. Main conclusions of this research: First, the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas takes local featured cultural resources as core tools, the increase of economic returns in poverty-stricken areas as the main axis running through the standardization of basic public cultural services, and state legal security systems, poverty-alleviation tasks of party and government organizations, and people’s rigid cultural demands as direct driving forces to motivate the potential of local party and government organizations, cultural management and service institutions, and the people themselves. Besides, in a stepwise manner, the mechanism strives for the equilibrium point between economic and social benefits of local basic public cultural services by constantly pushing forward the development of the standardization of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, and takes the eastern developed regions as a benchmark to improve the level of local basic public cultural services and realize the ultimate goal of ensuring the basic cultural rights and improving the cultural literacy of people in poverty-stricken areas. Second, the essence of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas is a process in which the standard motivated by various driving forces adapts to itself and reaches the expected equilibrium. Before a new expected equilibrium is reached, potential difference of development is the stimulating factor of new driving forces. The essence of the standardization of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas is a process in which national standard adapts to itself and reaches the expected equilibrium. Before a new expected equilibrium is reached, potential difference of development is the stimulating factor of new driving forces. Third, the process of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas is where economic and social benefits improve in a stepwise manner. The running process of the standardization of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas begins from “motivation by driving forces, and implementation of services in line with standard” to “self-adaption of standard, reaching of relative expected equilibrium and re-motivation after potential difference of development is generated”. The economic and social values of local featured cultural resources, which run through this process, are intuitively manifested by the stepwise increase of economic and social benefits after people in poverty-stricken areas participated in basic public cultural services. This kind of increase benefits all civilians instead of certain part of people in the areas. Fourth, the aim of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas is to improve people’s cultural participation initiative via economic benefits. Featured cultural resources in poverty-stricken areas are intangible assets locally. Integrating intangible cultural heritage into basic public cultural services, on the one hand, enables ordinary people to be interested in cultural participation and obtain tangible benefits, and on the other hand, protects, inherits, and publicizes local culture. Fifth, the core link of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas lies in the economic value of local featured cultural resources. Instead of working in opposition to each other, culture and economy complement and integrate with each other. The standardization of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas has always implied the core link of the economic value of local featured cultural resources, whether in the process of motivation by driving forces, implementation in line with standard, self-adaption of standard and reaching of expected equilibrium, or even in the process where a certain level of expected equilibrium is achieved and potential difference of development is re-generated. Main innovative points in this research: Firstly, this research has filled the vacancy of studies on the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, and explored the essential attributes and core link of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, which have enriched researches on the standardization of basic public cultural services, and provided a theoretical basis for subsequent researchers to study the standardization of basic public cultural services. Secondly, this research has further clarified the running process of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, deepened researches on the standardization of basic public cultural services, and provided significant insights in breaking the fuzzy relation between the levels of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas and social & economic development, especially in smashing up the conventional and fixed impression that the development trend of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas is unclear. Thirdly, the research has proposed that the driving forces of the standardization mechanism of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas are constituted by party and government organizations, laws and people (market), which has echoed the development of national governance system in recent years, enriched and developed theories related to national governance in basic public culture, and provided a new perspective for existing national governance theories. Main contributions made by this research to practical work: First, this research has opened the “black box” of the standardization mechanism of the basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, provided government and public cultural institutions with in-depth perspectives from superficial phenomena to mechanism by means of proposed model and standard system, revealed the whole process of the standardization of basic public cultural services in poverty-stricken areas, and supplied practical mechanism analysis in different phases to government and public cultural institutions, so as to provide strong references for decision making in a scientific manner. Second, this research has discussed concrete measures and implementation paths for the unified and coordinated development of basic public cultural services and economic and social benefits in poverty-stricken areas, which is of certain practical reference value for public cultural service work in the vast poor areas in China. Figure 7, table 42, reference 199.
查看全文：	预览  下载(下载需要进行登录)